Agricultural Schemes in India: List and Importance for UPSC
What happened
India's agricultural schemes address farmer income, infrastructure, and sustainability challenges. PM-KISAN provides Rs. 6,000 annual income support to 11+ crore farmers. PMFBY offers crop insurance with Rs. 1.5 lakh crore claims paid since 2016. Agriculture Infrastructure Fund sanctioned Rs. 33,209 crore for post-harvest infrastructure. Modified Interest Subvention reduces loan rates to 4%. Per Drop More Crop covers 78 lakh hectares under micro-irrigation. 7,774 Farmer-Producer Organizations formed under 10,000 FPO scheme. e-NAM connects 1,389 mandis across 23 states with 1.76 crore registered farmers.
Why it matters
Agricultural schemes form India's comprehensive farmer support ecosystem, addressing income vulnerability, infrastructure gaps, and market access challenges that affect 146 million agricultural holdings. The architecture spans direct income transfers (PM-KISAN's Rs. 6,000), risk mitigation (PMFBY crop insurance), credit facilitation (4% effective interest through MISS), and infrastructure development (AIF's Rs. 1 lakh crore corpus). These schemes operate through different implementation mechanisms - Central Sector schemes like PM-KISAN use direct benefit transfer, while Centrally Sponsored schemes like RKVY allow state flexibility. The ecosystem promotes farmer collectives through FPO formation, digital integration via e-NAM platform, and sustainable practices through organic farming schemes like PKVY. Modern additions include drone technology (Namo Drone Didi) and AI-powered soil health mapping. This multi-layered approach addresses the structural challenges of Indian agriculture - fragmented landholdings, weather dependency, limited market access, and inadequate post-harvest infrastructure. The schemes collectively aim to double farmer income, reduce input costs, improve productivity, and create resilient agricultural value chains essential for food security and rural prosperity.
India stays fastest-growing major global economy despite slipping to 6th GDP ranking
What happened
India maintained its position as the world's fastest-growing major economy with 7.7% GDP growth in FY 2025-26, accelerating from 7.1% in FY24-25. Despite this robust performance, India remains sixth in global GDP rankings in nominal dollar terms at $3.9-4.1 trillion, behind US, China, Germany, Japan, and UK. The ranking reflects currency depreciation and statistical revisions rather than economic fundamentals. India remains third-largest economy by purchasing power parity after US and China.
Why it matters
India's economic performance presents a paradox between growth dynamism and global ranking stagnation. While achieving 7.7% GDP growth in FY26 - substantially higher than advanced economies' 1-3% rates - India's nominal GDP ranking remains sixth due to rupee depreciation against the dollar. This disconnect highlights the difference between real economic strength and dollar-denominated metrics used for international comparisons. The growth momentum stems from domestic consumption, infrastructure investment, digitalization, and manufacturing expansion under initiatives like PLI scheme. Despite external headwinds including Middle East tensions, elevated oil prices, and global supply chain disruptions, India's economic fundamentals remain robust. The economy's resilience is particularly significant given that major economies face sluggish growth and inflationary pressures. By PPP measures, which adjust for cost of living differences, India ranks third globally, better reflecting domestic economic scale. International institutions project India could become the world's third-largest economy in nominal terms by early 2030s, overtaking Japan and Germany, driven by continued high growth rates, favorable demographics, expanding middle class, and massive infrastructure investments.
Top Legal Developments [1-7 June]: Victim Protection Plan, Chambal Sand Mining, Right to Be Forgotten, PoSH & Other Key Verdicts & Policy Updates
What happened
The first week of June 2026 witnessed pivotal legal developments across constitutional and environmental law. The Supreme Court issued comprehensive directions to three states over illegal sand mining in the National Chambal Sanctuary, established a landmark Victim Protection Plan for human trafficking cases, and ruled on criminal antecedents in bail decisions. Delhi High Court recognized the right to be forgotten under Article 21. Key rulings covered welfare benefits, disability pension, and Lok Adalat jurisdiction limits in divorce cases.
Why it matters
This week's legal developments showcase the judiciary's expanding role in constitutional interpretation and environmental protection. The Supreme Court's Chambal Sanctuary ruling demonstrates Article 142's sweeping powers to enforce environmental obligations under Articles 21, 48-A, and 51-A(g), spanning three states. The Victim Protection Plan in trafficking cases reflects a victim-centric constitutional approach, treating rehabilitation as integral to Article 21's dignity guarantee. The right to be forgotten recognition by Delhi High Court establishes informational privacy as a constitutional facet, crucial for digital age jurisprudence. Criminal law witnessed refinement in bail jurisprudence, emphasizing that criminal antecedents directly impact bail conditions compliance likelihood. The welfare benefits ruling reinforced gender equality principles under Articles 14 and 15(1), rejecting marital status-based discrimination. These decisions collectively demonstrate constitutional courts' role in adapting fundamental rights to contemporary challenges while maintaining checks on executive action through environmental mandamus and victim-centric remedies.